Backblaze B2 vs Koofr: Complete Comparison (2026)

By Sarah Mitchell, Cloud & Developer Tools Editorยท10 years of experienceยทUpdated 2026-04-24ยท8 min read

In comparing Backblaze B2 and Koofr in 2026, Backblaze B2 is the stronger choice for developers and businesses needing affordable, s3-compatible object storage due to very cheap storage cost. Koofr excels for users wanting to manage multiple cloud storage accounts from one interface with connects multiple cloud accounts. Backblaze B2 offers S3-compatible API, 10GB free, CDN integration starting at $0.006/GB/mo with a free plan. Koofr provides 10GB free, Connect Google Drive and Dropbox, WebDAV support from $2.99/mo with a free tier. For teams prioritizing value, Backblaze B2 delivers a hiltonsoftware Score of 78/100. Backblaze B2 and Koofr compete in the cloud storage segment of the SaaS market, where cloud-native solutions, API integrations, and workflow automation drive enterprise and SMB adoption. Other leading cloud storage tools include Google Drive, Dropbox, OneDrive. Backblaze B2 serves 500K+ users globally (founded 2007) while Koofr reports 500K+ active users (founded 2012).

Backblaze B2 vs Koofr at a Glance

Backblaze B2
Koofr
Starting Price
$0.006/GB/mo
$2.99/mo
Free Plan
Yes
Yes
User Rating
4.6/5
4.3/5
Best For
Developers and businesses needing affordable, S3-c...
Users wanting to manage multiple cloud storage acc...
Users
500K+
500K+
Founded
2007
2012
hiltonsoftware Score
78/100
71/100
Pricing verified: March 2026 ยท Based on official vendor data
๐Ÿ”ฅ
Backblaze B2
Cloud Storage
78
hiltonsoftware.co Score
RECOMMENDED
VS
โ˜๏ธ
Koofr
Cloud Storage
71
hiltonsoftware.co Score

What are the main differences between Backblaze B2 and Koofr?

Backblaze B2 and Koofr differ across ease of use, features, value, support, integrations, scalability, and learning curve. Backblaze B2 leads in 7 of 7 categories.

Backblaze B2Koofr
85Ease of Use82
80Features75
74Value for Money69
74Customer Support65
71Integrations66
66Scalability64
75Learning Curve71

What are the pros and cons of Backblaze B2 vs Koofr?

Backblaze B2
+Very cheap storage cost
+S3 API compatible
-No desktop sync client
-Developer-focused, not end-user
Koofr
+Connects multiple cloud accounts
+Affordable European provider
-Basic interface
-Limited collaboration features

Which is better, Backblaze B2 or Koofr?

After evaluating Backblaze B2 and Koofr across features, pricing, integrations, and user satisfaction, Backblaze B2 earns a higher hiltonsoftware Score of 78/100 versus Koofr at 71/100. Backblaze B2 stands out for "very cheap storage cost" and "s3 api compatible". Koofr delivers competitive advantages in "connects multiple cloud accounts", making Koofr a viable alternative.

Both Backblaze B2 and Koofr offer free plans. Backblaze B2 paid plans start at $0.006/GB/mo while Koofr begins at $2.99/mo. ROI depends on which features justify upgrading.

Bottom line: Choose Backblaze B2 for developers and businesses needing affordable, s3-compatible object storage. Choose Koofr for users wanting to manage multiple cloud storage accounts from one interface. Both Backblaze B2 and Koofr are established cloud storage platforms.

CHOOSE BACKBLAZE B2 IF:

Developers and businesses needing affordable, S3-compatible object storage.

CHOOSE KOOFR IF:

Users wanting to manage multiple cloud storage accounts from one interface.

Backblaze B2 vs Koofr: Frequently Asked Questions

Is Backblaze B2 better than Koofr in 2026?
Backblaze B2 outperforms Koofr in the 2026 hiltonsoftware.co analysis with a score of 78/100 compared to 71/100. Backblaze B2 excels in S3-compatible API, 10GB free, CDN integration, making Backblaze B2 the better choice for Developers and businesses needing affordable, S3-compatible object storage. Koofr is the stronger option for Users wanting to manage multiple cloud storage accounts from one interface due to connects multiple cloud accounts. For teams needing s3-compatible api, hiltonsoftware.co recommends Backblaze B2.
How does Backblaze B2 pricing compare to Koofr in 2026?
Backblaze B2 starts at $0.006/GB/mo and includes a free plan. Koofr starts at $2.99/mo and offers a free plan. Backblaze B2 includes features like S3-compatible API, 10GB free, CDN integration. Koofr provides 10GB free, Connect Google Drive and Dropbox, WebDAV support. Backblaze B2 serves 500K+ users while Koofr serves 500K+ users. Evaluate total cost of ownership based on team size and required integrations.
What are the main differences between Backblaze B2 and Koofr?
Backblaze B2 specializes in S3-compatible API, 10GB free, CDN integration, earning a 78/100 hiltonsoftware Score. Koofr focuses on 10GB free, Connect Google Drive and Dropbox, WebDAV support, scoring 71/100. Backblaze B2 is best for Developers and businesses needing affordable, S3-compatible object storage. Koofr is best for Users wanting to manage multiple cloud storage accounts from one interface. Both Backblaze B2 and Koofr serve the Cloud Storage market but target different user profiles.
Can I migrate from Backblaze B2 to Koofr?
Migrating from Backblaze B2 to Koofr is possible since both operate in the Cloud Storage space. Export data from Backblaze B2 and verify Koofr import capabilities. Key features to evaluate: S3-compatible API, 10GB free, CDN integration (Backblaze B2) versus 10GB free, Connect Google Drive and Dropbox, WebDAV support (Koofr). Running both Backblaze B2 and Koofr in parallel during a trial period ensures a smooth transition.
Is Backblaze B2 or Koofr better for small business?
Both Backblaze B2 and Koofr offer free plans. Backblaze B2 (78/100) is ideal for Developers and businesses needing affordable, S3-compatible object storage. Koofr (71/100) fits Users wanting to manage multiple cloud storage accounts from one interface. Evaluate both during trial periods.

Reviewed by Sarah Mitchell, Cloud & Developer Tools Editor. Last updated: 2026-04-24. Pricing verified: March 2026.

Read our scoring methodology to understand how the hiltonsoftware Score is calculated.

Explore More Comparisons & Tools