DataRobot vs Make (Integromat): Complete Comparison (2026)

By Sarah Mitchell, Cloud & Developer Tools Editorยท10 years of experienceยทUpdated 2026-04-24ยท8 min read

In comparing DataRobot and Make (Integromat) in 2026, Make (Integromat) is the stronger choice for power users building complex, multi-step automations between apps due to very powerful and flexible automation. DataRobot excels for enterprises wanting automated ml without deep data science expertise with excellent automated ml capabilities. DataRobot offers AutoML, Model deployment, MLOps starting at Custom pricing. Make (Integromat) provides Visual workflow builder, 1500+ app integrations, AI tools from $9/mo with a free tier. For teams prioritizing value, Make (Integromat) delivers a hiltonsoftware Score of 79/100. DataRobot and Make (Integromat) compete in the ai & machine learning segment of the SaaS market, where cloud-native solutions, API integrations, and workflow automation drive enterprise and SMB adoption. Other leading ai & machine learning tools include ChatGPT, Claude, GitHub Copilot. DataRobot serves 3K+ orgs users globally (founded 2012) while Make (Integromat) reports 800K+ active users (founded 2012).

DataRobot vs Make (Integromat) at a Glance

DataRobot
Make (Integromat)
Starting Price
Custom pricing
$9/mo
Free Plan
No
Yes
User Rating
4.3/5
4.7/5
Best For
Enterprises wanting automated ML without deep data...
Power users building complex, multi-step automatio...
Users
3K+ orgs
800K+
Founded
2012
2012
hiltonsoftware Score
59/100
79/100
Pricing verified: March 2026 ยท Based on official vendor data
๐Ÿค–
DataRobot
AI & Machine Learning
59
hiltonsoftware.co Score
VS
โš™๏ธ
Make (Integromat)
AI & Machine Learning
79
hiltonsoftware.co Score
RECOMMENDED

What are the main differences between DataRobot and Make (Integromat)?

DataRobot and Make (Integromat) differ across ease of use, features, value, support, integrations, scalability, and learning curve. Make (Integromat) leads in 7 of 7 categories.

DataRobotMake (Integromat)
77Ease of Use89
76Features82
60Value for Money78
64Customer Support71
54Integrations68
58Scalability68
65Learning Curve78

What are the pros and cons of DataRobot vs Make (Integromat)?

DataRobot
+Excellent automated ML capabilities
+Good for non-data-scientists
-Very expensive enterprise pricing
-Less flexibility than custom code
Make (Integromat)
+Very powerful and flexible automation
+Better than Zapier for complex flows
-Steeper learning curve than Zapier
-Operations-based pricing confuses users

Which is better, DataRobot or Make (Integromat)?

After evaluating DataRobot and Make (Integromat) across features, pricing, integrations, and user satisfaction, Make (Integromat) earns a higher hiltonsoftware Score of 79/100 versus DataRobot at 59/100. Make (Integromat) stands out for "very powerful and flexible automation" and "better than zapier for complex flows". DataRobot delivers competitive advantages in "excellent automated ml capabilities", making DataRobot a viable alternative.

On pricing, Make (Integromat) offers a free plan for SMBs and startups. DataRobot starts at Custom pricing with no free tier, but justifies the cost with automl and model deployment and enterprise-grade scalability.

Bottom line: Choose DataRobot for enterprises wanting automated ml without deep data science expertise. Choose Make (Integromat) for power users building complex, multi-step automations between apps. Both DataRobot and Make (Integromat) are established ai & machine learning platforms.

CHOOSE DATAROBOT IF:

Enterprises wanting automated ML without deep data science expertise.

CHOOSE MAKE (INTEGROMAT) IF:

Power users building complex, multi-step automations between apps.

DataRobot vs Make (Integromat): Frequently Asked Questions

Is DataRobot better than Make (Integromat) in 2026?
Make (Integromat) outperforms DataRobot in the 2026 hiltonsoftware.co analysis with a score of 79/100 compared to 59/100. DataRobot excels in AutoML, Model deployment, MLOps, making DataRobot the better choice for Enterprises wanting automated ML without deep data science expertise. Make (Integromat) is the stronger option for Power users building complex, multi-step automations between apps due to very powerful and flexible automation. For teams needing visual workflow builder, hiltonsoftware.co recommends Make (Integromat).
How does DataRobot pricing compare to Make (Integromat) in 2026?
DataRobot starts at Custom pricing with no free tier. Make (Integromat) starts at $9/mo and offers a free plan. DataRobot includes features like AutoML, Model deployment, MLOps. Make (Integromat) provides Visual workflow builder, 1500+ app integrations, AI tools. DataRobot serves 3K+ orgs users while Make (Integromat) serves 800K+ users. Evaluate total cost of ownership based on team size and required integrations.
What are the main differences between DataRobot and Make (Integromat)?
DataRobot specializes in AutoML, Model deployment, MLOps, earning a 59/100 hiltonsoftware Score. Make (Integromat) focuses on Visual workflow builder, 1500+ app integrations, AI tools, scoring 79/100. DataRobot is best for Enterprises wanting automated ML without deep data science expertise. Make (Integromat) is best for Power users building complex, multi-step automations between apps. Both DataRobot and Make (Integromat) serve the AI & Machine Learning market but target different user profiles.
Can I migrate from DataRobot to Make (Integromat)?
Migrating from DataRobot to Make (Integromat) is possible since both operate in the AI & Machine Learning space. Export data from DataRobot and verify Make (Integromat) import capabilities. Key features to evaluate: AutoML, Model deployment, MLOps (DataRobot) versus Visual workflow builder, 1500+ app integrations, AI tools (Make (Integromat)). Running both DataRobot and Make (Integromat) in parallel during a trial period ensures a smooth transition.
Is DataRobot or Make (Integromat) better for small business?
For small businesses, Make (Integromat) offers a free plan making Make (Integromat) more budget-friendly at 79/100 on hiltonsoftware.co. DataRobot (starting at Custom pricing) is worth considering for AutoML, Model deployment, MLOps. Both DataRobot and Make (Integromat) scale from SMB to enterprise.

Reviewed by Sarah Mitchell, Cloud & Developer Tools Editor. Last updated: 2026-04-24. Pricing verified: March 2026.

Read our scoring methodology to understand how the hiltonsoftware Score is calculated.

Explore More Comparisons & Tools