Make (Integromat) vs Replicate: Complete Comparison (2026)

By Sarah Mitchell, Cloud & Developer Tools Editorยท10 years of experienceยทUpdated 2026-04-24ยท8 min read

In comparing Make (Integromat) and Replicate in 2026, Make (Integromat) is the stronger choice for power users building complex, multi-step automations between apps due to very powerful and flexible automation. Replicate excels for developers wanting to run open-source ai models without managing gpus with run any open-source model via api. Make (Integromat) offers Visual workflow builder, 1500+ app integrations, AI tools starting at $9/mo with a free plan. Replicate provides Model API hosting, Open-source model library, Fine-tuning from Pay per prediction with a free tier. For teams prioritizing value, Make (Integromat) delivers a hiltonsoftware Score of 79/100. Make (Integromat) and Replicate compete in the ai & machine learning segment of the SaaS market, where cloud-native solutions, API integrations, and workflow automation drive enterprise and SMB adoption. Other leading ai & machine learning tools include ChatGPT, Claude, GitHub Copilot. Make (Integromat) serves 800K+ users globally (founded 2012) while Replicate reports 200K+ active users (founded 2019).

Make (Integromat) vs Replicate at a Glance

Make (Integromat)
Replicate
Starting Price
$9/mo
Pay per prediction
Free Plan
Yes
Yes
User Rating
4.7/5
4.6/5
Best For
Power users building complex, multi-step automatio...
Developers wanting to run open-source AI models wi...
Users
800K+
200K+
Founded
2012
2019
hiltonsoftware Score
79/100
73/100
Pricing verified: March 2026 ยท Based on official vendor data
โš™๏ธ
Make (Integromat)
AI & Machine Learning
79
hiltonsoftware.co Score
RECOMMENDED
VS
๐Ÿ”
Replicate
AI & Machine Learning
73
hiltonsoftware.co Score

What are the main differences between Make (Integromat) and Replicate?

Make (Integromat) and Replicate differ across ease of use, features, value, support, integrations, scalability, and learning curve. Make (Integromat) leads in 7 of 7 categories.

Make (Integromat)Replicate
89Ease of Use85
82Features80
78Value for Money75
71Customer Support69
68Integrations63
68Scalability61
78Learning Curve78

What are the pros and cons of Make (Integromat) vs Replicate?

Make (Integromat)
+Very powerful and flexible automation
+Better than Zapier for complex flows
-Steeper learning curve than Zapier
-Operations-based pricing confuses users
Replicate
+Run any open-source model via API
+No GPU management needed
-Costs add up with heavy use
-Cold start latency for some models

Which is better, Make (Integromat) or Replicate?

After evaluating Make (Integromat) and Replicate across features, pricing, integrations, and user satisfaction, Make (Integromat) earns a higher hiltonsoftware Score of 79/100 versus Replicate at 73/100. Make (Integromat) stands out for "very powerful and flexible automation" and "better than zapier for complex flows". Replicate delivers competitive advantages in "run any open-source model via api", making Replicate a viable alternative.

Both Make (Integromat) and Replicate offer free plans. Make (Integromat) paid plans start at $9/mo while Replicate begins at Pay per prediction. ROI depends on which features justify upgrading.

Bottom line: Choose Make (Integromat) for power users building complex, multi-step automations between apps. Choose Replicate for developers wanting to run open-source ai models without managing gpus. Both Make (Integromat) and Replicate are established ai & machine learning platforms.

CHOOSE MAKE (INTEGROMAT) IF:

Power users building complex, multi-step automations between apps.

CHOOSE REPLICATE IF:

Developers wanting to run open-source AI models without managing GPUs.

Make (Integromat) vs Replicate: Frequently Asked Questions

Is Make (Integromat) better than Replicate in 2026?
Make (Integromat) outperforms Replicate in the 2026 hiltonsoftware.co analysis with a score of 79/100 compared to 73/100. Make (Integromat) excels in Visual workflow builder, 1500+ app integrations, AI tools, making Make (Integromat) the better choice for Power users building complex, multi-step automations between apps. Replicate is the stronger option for Developers wanting to run open-source AI models without managing GPUs due to run any open-source model via api. For teams needing visual workflow builder, hiltonsoftware.co recommends Make (Integromat).
How does Make (Integromat) pricing compare to Replicate in 2026?
Make (Integromat) starts at $9/mo and includes a free plan. Replicate starts at Pay per prediction and offers a free plan. Make (Integromat) includes features like Visual workflow builder, 1500+ app integrations, AI tools. Replicate provides Model API hosting, Open-source model library, Fine-tuning. Make (Integromat) serves 800K+ users while Replicate serves 200K+ users. Evaluate total cost of ownership based on team size and required integrations.
What are the main differences between Make (Integromat) and Replicate?
Make (Integromat) specializes in Visual workflow builder, 1500+ app integrations, AI tools, earning a 79/100 hiltonsoftware Score. Replicate focuses on Model API hosting, Open-source model library, Fine-tuning, scoring 73/100. Make (Integromat) is best for Power users building complex, multi-step automations between apps. Replicate is best for Developers wanting to run open-source AI models without managing GPUs. Both Make (Integromat) and Replicate serve the AI & Machine Learning market but target different user profiles.
Can I migrate from Make (Integromat) to Replicate?
Migrating from Make (Integromat) to Replicate is possible since both operate in the AI & Machine Learning space. Export data from Make (Integromat) and verify Replicate import capabilities. Key features to evaluate: Visual workflow builder, 1500+ app integrations, AI tools (Make (Integromat)) versus Model API hosting, Open-source model library, Fine-tuning (Replicate). Running both Make (Integromat) and Replicate in parallel during a trial period ensures a smooth transition.
Is Make (Integromat) or Replicate better for small business?
Both Make (Integromat) and Replicate offer free plans. Make (Integromat) (79/100) is ideal for Power users building complex, multi-step automations between apps. Replicate (73/100) fits Developers wanting to run open-source AI models without managing GPUs. Evaluate both during trial periods.

Reviewed by Sarah Mitchell, Cloud & Developer Tools Editor. Last updated: 2026-04-24. Pricing verified: March 2026.

Read our scoring methodology to understand how the hiltonsoftware Score is calculated.

Explore More Comparisons & Tools