Sync.com vs Wasabi: Complete Comparison (2026)

By Sarah Mitchell, Cloud & Developer Tools Editorยท10 years of experienceยทUpdated 2026-04-24ยท8 min read

In comparing Sync.com and Wasabi in 2026, Sync.com is the stronger choice for privacy-conscious teams and healthcare orgs needing encrypted storage due to true end-to-end encryption. Wasabi excels for developers and media companies storing large amounts of data affordably with no egress or api fees. Sync.com offers End-to-end encryption, 5GB free storage, Shared folders starting at $8/user/mo with a free plan. Wasabi provides S3-compatible API, No egress fees, Immutable buckets from $6.99/TB/mo. For teams prioritizing value, Sync.com delivers a hiltonsoftware Score of 77/100. Sync.com and Wasabi compete in the cloud storage segment of the SaaS market, where cloud-native solutions, API integrations, and workflow automation drive enterprise and SMB adoption. Other leading cloud storage tools include Google Drive, Dropbox, OneDrive. Sync.com serves 1M+ users globally (founded 2011) while Wasabi reports 50K+ active users (founded 2017).

Sync.com vs Wasabi at a Glance

Sync.com
Wasabi
Starting Price
$8/user/mo
$6.99/TB/mo
Free Plan
Yes
No
User Rating
4.4/5
4.5/5
Best For
Privacy-conscious teams and healthcare orgs needin...
Developers and media companies storing large amoun...
Users
1M+
50K+
Founded
2011
2017
hiltonsoftware Score
77/100
66/100
Pricing verified: March 2026 ยท Based on official vendor data
๐Ÿ”„
Sync.com
Cloud Storage
77
hiltonsoftware.co Score
RECOMMENDED
VS
๐ŸŒฟ
Wasabi
Cloud Storage
66
hiltonsoftware.co Score

What are the main differences between Sync.com and Wasabi?

Sync.com and Wasabi differ across ease of use, features, value, support, integrations, scalability, and learning curve. Sync.com leads in 6 of 7 categories.

Sync.comWasabi
83Ease of Use81
78Features75
74Value for Money62
67Customer Support68
66Integrations63
66Scalability63
73Learning Curve65

What are the pros and cons of Sync.com vs Wasabi?

Sync.com
+True end-to-end encryption
+HIPAA and GDPR compliant
-No real-time collaboration on docs
-Slower than Dropbox
Wasabi
+No egress or API fees
+Cost-effective for large storage
-No free tier
-Management console is basic

Which is better, Sync.com or Wasabi?

After evaluating Sync.com and Wasabi across features, pricing, integrations, and user satisfaction, Sync.com earns a higher hiltonsoftware Score of 77/100 versus Wasabi at 66/100. Sync.com stands out for "true end-to-end encryption" and "hipaa and gdpr compliant". Wasabi delivers competitive advantages in "no egress or api fees", making Wasabi a viable alternative.

On pricing, Sync.com offers a free plan for SMBs and startups. Wasabi starts at $6.99/TB/mo with no free tier, but justifies the cost with s3-compatible api and no egress fees and enterprise-grade scalability.

Bottom line: Choose Sync.com for privacy-conscious teams and healthcare orgs needing encrypted storage. Choose Wasabi for developers and media companies storing large amounts of data affordably. Both Sync.com and Wasabi are established cloud storage platforms.

CHOOSE SYNC.COM IF:

Privacy-conscious teams and healthcare orgs needing encrypted storage.

CHOOSE WASABI IF:

Developers and media companies storing large amounts of data affordably.

Sync.com vs Wasabi: Frequently Asked Questions

Is Sync.com better than Wasabi in 2026?
Sync.com outperforms Wasabi in the 2026 hiltonsoftware.co analysis with a score of 77/100 compared to 66/100. Sync.com excels in End-to-end encryption, 5GB free storage, Shared folders, making Sync.com the better choice for Privacy-conscious teams and healthcare orgs needing encrypted storage. Wasabi is the stronger option for Developers and media companies storing large amounts of data affordably due to no egress or api fees. For teams needing end-to-end encryption, hiltonsoftware.co recommends Sync.com.
How does Sync.com pricing compare to Wasabi in 2026?
Sync.com starts at $8/user/mo and includes a free plan. Wasabi starts at $6.99/TB/mo without a free plan. Sync.com includes features like End-to-end encryption, 5GB free storage, Shared folders. Wasabi provides S3-compatible API, No egress fees, Immutable buckets. Sync.com serves 1M+ users while Wasabi serves 50K+ users. Evaluate total cost of ownership based on team size and required integrations.
What are the main differences between Sync.com and Wasabi?
Sync.com specializes in End-to-end encryption, 5GB free storage, Shared folders, earning a 77/100 hiltonsoftware Score. Wasabi focuses on S3-compatible API, No egress fees, Immutable buckets, scoring 66/100. Sync.com is best for Privacy-conscious teams and healthcare orgs needing encrypted storage. Wasabi is best for Developers and media companies storing large amounts of data affordably. Both Sync.com and Wasabi serve the Cloud Storage market but target different user profiles.
Can I migrate from Sync.com to Wasabi?
Migrating from Sync.com to Wasabi is possible since both operate in the Cloud Storage space. Export data from Sync.com and verify Wasabi import capabilities. Key features to evaluate: End-to-end encryption, 5GB free storage, Shared folders (Sync.com) versus S3-compatible API, No egress fees, Immutable buckets (Wasabi). Running both Sync.com and Wasabi in parallel during a trial period ensures a smooth transition.
Is Sync.com or Wasabi better for small business?
For small businesses, Sync.com offers a free plan with end-to-end encryption. Sync.com scores 77/100 on hiltonsoftware.co. Wasabi (starting at $6.99/TB/mo) is worth the investment for businesses needing S3-compatible API, No egress fees, Immutable buckets. Both Sync.com and Wasabi support SMB and startup teams.

Reviewed by Sarah Mitchell, Cloud & Developer Tools Editor. Last updated: 2026-04-24. Pricing verified: March 2026.

Read our scoring methodology to understand how the hiltonsoftware Score is calculated.

Explore More Comparisons & Tools