Backblaze B2 vs Wasabi: Complete Comparison (2026)

By Sarah Mitchell, Cloud & Developer Tools Editorยท10 years of experienceยทUpdated 2026-04-24ยท8 min read

In comparing Backblaze B2 and Wasabi in 2026, Backblaze B2 is the stronger choice for developers and businesses needing affordable, s3-compatible object storage due to very cheap storage cost. Wasabi excels for developers and media companies storing large amounts of data affordably with no egress or api fees. Backblaze B2 offers S3-compatible API, 10GB free, CDN integration starting at $0.006/GB/mo with a free plan. Wasabi provides S3-compatible API, No egress fees, Immutable buckets from $6.99/TB/mo. For teams prioritizing value, Backblaze B2 delivers a hiltonsoftware Score of 78/100. Backblaze B2 and Wasabi compete in the cloud storage segment of the SaaS market, where cloud-native solutions, API integrations, and workflow automation drive enterprise and SMB adoption. Other leading cloud storage tools include Google Drive, Dropbox, OneDrive. Backblaze B2 serves 500K+ users globally (founded 2007) while Wasabi reports 50K+ active users (founded 2017).

Backblaze B2 vs Wasabi at a Glance

Backblaze B2
Wasabi
Starting Price
$0.006/GB/mo
$6.99/TB/mo
Free Plan
Yes
No
User Rating
4.6/5
4.5/5
Best For
Developers and businesses needing affordable, S3-c...
Developers and media companies storing large amoun...
Users
500K+
50K+
Founded
2007
2017
hiltonsoftware Score
78/100
66/100
Pricing verified: March 2026 ยท Based on official vendor data
๐Ÿ”ฅ
Backblaze B2
Cloud Storage
78
hiltonsoftware.co Score
RECOMMENDED
VS
๐ŸŒฟ
Wasabi
Cloud Storage
66
hiltonsoftware.co Score

What are the main differences between Backblaze B2 and Wasabi?

Backblaze B2 and Wasabi differ across ease of use, features, value, support, integrations, scalability, and learning curve. Backblaze B2 leads in 7 of 7 categories.

Backblaze B2Wasabi
85Ease of Use81
80Features75
74Value for Money62
74Customer Support68
71Integrations63
66Scalability63
75Learning Curve65

What are the pros and cons of Backblaze B2 vs Wasabi?

Backblaze B2
+Very cheap storage cost
+S3 API compatible
-No desktop sync client
-Developer-focused, not end-user
Wasabi
+No egress or API fees
+Cost-effective for large storage
-No free tier
-Management console is basic

Which is better, Backblaze B2 or Wasabi?

After evaluating Backblaze B2 and Wasabi across features, pricing, integrations, and user satisfaction, Backblaze B2 earns a higher hiltonsoftware Score of 78/100 versus Wasabi at 66/100. Backblaze B2 stands out for "very cheap storage cost" and "s3 api compatible". Wasabi delivers competitive advantages in "no egress or api fees", making Wasabi a viable alternative.

On pricing, Backblaze B2 offers a free plan for SMBs and startups. Wasabi starts at $6.99/TB/mo with no free tier, but justifies the cost with s3-compatible api and no egress fees and enterprise-grade scalability.

Bottom line: Choose Backblaze B2 for developers and businesses needing affordable, s3-compatible object storage. Choose Wasabi for developers and media companies storing large amounts of data affordably. Both Backblaze B2 and Wasabi are established cloud storage platforms.

CHOOSE BACKBLAZE B2 IF:

Developers and businesses needing affordable, S3-compatible object storage.

CHOOSE WASABI IF:

Developers and media companies storing large amounts of data affordably.

Backblaze B2 vs Wasabi: Frequently Asked Questions

Is Backblaze B2 better than Wasabi in 2026?
Backblaze B2 outperforms Wasabi in the 2026 hiltonsoftware.co analysis with a score of 78/100 compared to 66/100. Backblaze B2 excels in S3-compatible API, 10GB free, CDN integration, making Backblaze B2 the better choice for Developers and businesses needing affordable, S3-compatible object storage. Wasabi is the stronger option for Developers and media companies storing large amounts of data affordably due to no egress or api fees. For teams needing s3-compatible api, hiltonsoftware.co recommends Backblaze B2.
How does Backblaze B2 pricing compare to Wasabi in 2026?
Backblaze B2 starts at $0.006/GB/mo and includes a free plan. Wasabi starts at $6.99/TB/mo without a free plan. Backblaze B2 includes features like S3-compatible API, 10GB free, CDN integration. Wasabi provides S3-compatible API, No egress fees, Immutable buckets. Backblaze B2 serves 500K+ users while Wasabi serves 50K+ users. Evaluate total cost of ownership based on team size and required integrations.
What are the main differences between Backblaze B2 and Wasabi?
Backblaze B2 specializes in S3-compatible API, 10GB free, CDN integration, earning a 78/100 hiltonsoftware Score. Wasabi focuses on S3-compatible API, No egress fees, Immutable buckets, scoring 66/100. Backblaze B2 is best for Developers and businesses needing affordable, S3-compatible object storage. Wasabi is best for Developers and media companies storing large amounts of data affordably. Both Backblaze B2 and Wasabi serve the Cloud Storage market but target different user profiles.
Can I migrate from Backblaze B2 to Wasabi?
Migrating from Backblaze B2 to Wasabi is possible since both operate in the Cloud Storage space. Export data from Backblaze B2 and verify Wasabi import capabilities. Key features to evaluate: S3-compatible API, 10GB free, CDN integration (Backblaze B2) versus S3-compatible API, No egress fees, Immutable buckets (Wasabi). Running both Backblaze B2 and Wasabi in parallel during a trial period ensures a smooth transition.
Is Backblaze B2 or Wasabi better for small business?
For small businesses, Backblaze B2 offers a free plan with s3-compatible api. Backblaze B2 scores 78/100 on hiltonsoftware.co. Wasabi (starting at $6.99/TB/mo) is worth the investment for businesses needing S3-compatible API, No egress fees, Immutable buckets. Both Backblaze B2 and Wasabi support SMB and startup teams.

Reviewed by Sarah Mitchell, Cloud & Developer Tools Editor. Last updated: 2026-04-24. Pricing verified: March 2026.

Read our scoring methodology to understand how the hiltonsoftware Score is calculated.

Explore More Comparisons & Tools