Loom vs Riverside.fm: Complete Comparison (2026)

By Elena Kowalski, Security & Enterprise Editorยท12 years of experienceยทUpdated 2026-04-24ยท8 min read

In comparing Loom and Riverside.fm in 2026, Loom is the stronger choice for remote teams replacing meetings with async video walkthroughs due to excellent for async communication. Riverside.fm excels for podcasters and video creators recording high-quality remote interviews with studio-quality local recording. Loom offers Screen recording, Webcam recording, Comments starting at $12.50/user/mo with a free plan. Riverside.fm provides Local recording, Separate tracks, Video and audio from $15/mo with a free tier. For teams prioritizing value, Loom delivers a hiltonsoftware Score of 84/100. Loom and Riverside.fm compete in the video conferencing segment of the SaaS market, where cloud-native solutions, API integrations, and workflow automation drive enterprise and SMB adoption. Other leading video conferencing tools include Zoom, Google Meet, Webex. Loom serves 25M+ users globally (founded 2016) while Riverside.fm reports 2M+ active users (founded 2019).

Loom vs Riverside.fm at a Glance

Loom
Riverside.fm
Starting Price
$12.50/user/mo
$15/mo
Free Plan
Yes
Yes
User Rating
4.7/5
4.6/5
Best For
Remote teams replacing meetings with async video w...
Podcasters and video creators recording high-quali...
Users
25M+
2M+
Founded
2016
2019
hiltonsoftware Score
84/100
78/100
Pricing verified: March 2026 ยท Based on official vendor data
๐ŸŽฌ
Loom
Video Conferencing
84
hiltonsoftware.co Score
RECOMMENDED
VS
๐ŸŽ™๏ธ
Riverside.fm
Video Conferencing
78
hiltonsoftware.co Score

What are the main differences between Loom and Riverside.fm?

Loom and Riverside.fm differ across ease of use, features, value, support, integrations, scalability, and learning curve. Loom leads in 7 of 7 categories.

LoomRiverside.fm
89Ease of Use86
82Features78
78Value for Money75
71Customer Support71
73Integrations65
72Scalability65
78Learning Curve76

What are the pros and cons of Loom vs Riverside.fm?

Loom
+Excellent for async communication
+Fast share via link
-5-min limit on free plan
-Not for live meetings
Riverside.fm
+Studio-quality local recording
+Separate audio tracks per guest
-Not for live streaming or meetings
-File upload after recording

Which is better, Loom or Riverside.fm?

After evaluating Loom and Riverside.fm across features, pricing, integrations, and user satisfaction, Loom earns a higher hiltonsoftware Score of 84/100 versus Riverside.fm at 78/100. Loom stands out for "excellent for async communication" and "fast share via link". Riverside.fm delivers competitive advantages in "studio-quality local recording", making Riverside.fm a viable alternative.

Both Loom and Riverside.fm offer free plans. Loom paid plans start at $12.50/user/mo while Riverside.fm begins at $15/mo. ROI depends on which features justify upgrading.

Bottom line: Choose Loom for remote teams replacing meetings with async video walkthroughs. Choose Riverside.fm for podcasters and video creators recording high-quality remote interviews. Both Loom and Riverside.fm are established video conferencing platforms.

CHOOSE LOOM IF:

Remote teams replacing meetings with async video walkthroughs.

CHOOSE RIVERSIDE.FM IF:

Podcasters and video creators recording high-quality remote interviews.

Loom vs Riverside.fm: Frequently Asked Questions

Is Loom better than Riverside.fm in 2026?
Loom outperforms Riverside.fm in the 2026 hiltonsoftware.co analysis with a score of 84/100 compared to 78/100. Loom excels in Screen recording, Webcam recording, Comments, making Loom the better choice for Remote teams replacing meetings with async video walkthroughs. Riverside.fm is the stronger option for Podcasters and video creators recording high-quality remote interviews due to studio-quality local recording. For teams needing screen recording, hiltonsoftware.co recommends Loom.
How does Loom pricing compare to Riverside.fm in 2026?
Loom starts at $12.50/user/mo and includes a free plan. Riverside.fm starts at $15/mo and offers a free plan. Loom includes features like Screen recording, Webcam recording, Comments. Riverside.fm provides Local recording, Separate tracks, Video and audio. Loom serves 25M+ users while Riverside.fm serves 2M+ users. Evaluate total cost of ownership based on team size and required integrations.
What are the main differences between Loom and Riverside.fm?
Loom specializes in Screen recording, Webcam recording, Comments, earning a 84/100 hiltonsoftware Score. Riverside.fm focuses on Local recording, Separate tracks, Video and audio, scoring 78/100. Loom is best for Remote teams replacing meetings with async video walkthroughs. Riverside.fm is best for Podcasters and video creators recording high-quality remote interviews. Both Loom and Riverside.fm serve the Video Conferencing market but target different user profiles.
Can I migrate from Loom to Riverside.fm?
Migrating from Loom to Riverside.fm is possible since both operate in the Video Conferencing space. Export data from Loom and verify Riverside.fm import capabilities. Key features to evaluate: Screen recording, Webcam recording, Comments (Loom) versus Local recording, Separate tracks, Video and audio (Riverside.fm). Running both Loom and Riverside.fm in parallel during a trial period ensures a smooth transition.
Is Loom or Riverside.fm better for small business?
Both Loom and Riverside.fm offer free plans. Loom (84/100) is ideal for Remote teams replacing meetings with async video walkthroughs. Riverside.fm (78/100) fits Podcasters and video creators recording high-quality remote interviews. Evaluate both during trial periods.

Reviewed by Elena Kowalski, Security & Enterprise Editor. Last updated: 2026-04-24. Pricing verified: March 2026.

Read our scoring methodology to understand how the hiltonsoftware Score is calculated.

Explore More Comparisons & Tools