Act-On vs Moosend: Complete Comparison (2026)

By Marcus Johnson, Marketing & Growth Specialistยท7 years of experienceยทUpdated 2026-04-24ยท8 min read

In comparing Act-On and Moosend in 2026, Moosend is the stronger choice for budget-focused marketers wanting solid automation at low cost due to very affordable pricing. Act-On excels for mid-market b2b companies wanting dedicated marketing automation beyond email with good for mid-market b2b. Act-On offers Lead nurturing, Email marketing, Landing pages starting at $900/mo. Moosend provides Email campaigns, Automation workflows, Landing pages from $9/mo with a free tier. For teams prioritizing value, Moosend delivers a hiltonsoftware Score of 75/100. Act-On and Moosend compete in the marketing automation segment of the SaaS market, where cloud-native solutions, API integrations, and workflow automation drive enterprise and SMB adoption. Other leading marketing automation tools include HubSpot Marketing, Marketo, Pardot. Act-On serves 4K+ orgs users globally (founded 2008) while Moosend reports 100K+ active users (founded 2011).

Act-On vs Moosend at a Glance

Act-On
Moosend
Starting Price
$900/mo
$9/mo
Free Plan
No
Yes
User Rating
4.2/5
4.6/5
Best For
Mid-market B2B companies wanting dedicated marketi...
Budget-focused marketers wanting solid automation ...
Users
4K+ orgs
100K+
Founded
2008
2011
hiltonsoftware Score
61/100
75/100
Pricing verified: March 2026 ยท Based on official vendor data
๐ŸŽฏ
Act-On
Marketing Automation
61
hiltonsoftware.co Score
VS
๐ŸฆŒ
Moosend
Marketing Automation
75
hiltonsoftware.co Score
RECOMMENDED

What are the main differences between Act-On and Moosend?

Act-On and Moosend differ across ease of use, features, value, support, integrations, scalability, and learning curve. Moosend leads in 7 of 7 categories.

Act-OnMoosend
72Ease of Use87
77Features79
60Value for Money72
65Customer Support73
54Integrations66
54Scalability65
64Learning Curve75

What are the pros and cons of Act-On vs Moosend?

Act-On
+Good for mid-market B2B
+Solid lead scoring
-Expensive for small teams
-Interface needs modernization
Moosend
+Very affordable pricing
+User-friendly interface
-Less known brand
-Fewer integrations than major rivals

Which is better, Act-On or Moosend?

After evaluating Act-On and Moosend across features, pricing, integrations, and user satisfaction, Moosend earns a higher hiltonsoftware Score of 75/100 versus Act-On at 61/100. Moosend stands out for "very affordable pricing" and "user-friendly interface". Act-On delivers competitive advantages in "good for mid-market b2b", making Act-On a viable alternative.

On pricing, Moosend offers a free plan for SMBs and startups. Act-On starts at $900/mo with no free tier, but justifies the cost with lead nurturing and email marketing and enterprise-grade scalability.

Bottom line: Choose Act-On for mid-market b2b companies wanting dedicated marketing automation beyond email. Choose Moosend for budget-focused marketers wanting solid automation at low cost. Both Act-On and Moosend are established marketing automation platforms.

CHOOSE ACT-ON IF:

Mid-market B2B companies wanting dedicated marketing automation beyond email.

CHOOSE MOOSEND IF:

Budget-focused marketers wanting solid automation at low cost.

Act-On vs Moosend: Frequently Asked Questions

Is Act-On better than Moosend in 2026?
Moosend outperforms Act-On in the 2026 hiltonsoftware.co analysis with a score of 75/100 compared to 61/100. Act-On excels in Lead nurturing, Email marketing, Landing pages, making Act-On the better choice for Mid-market B2B companies wanting dedicated marketing automation beyond email. Moosend is the stronger option for Budget-focused marketers wanting solid automation at low cost due to very affordable pricing. For teams needing email campaigns, hiltonsoftware.co recommends Moosend.
How does Act-On pricing compare to Moosend in 2026?
Act-On starts at $900/mo with no free tier. Moosend starts at $9/mo and offers a free plan. Act-On includes features like Lead nurturing, Email marketing, Landing pages. Moosend provides Email campaigns, Automation workflows, Landing pages. Act-On serves 4K+ orgs users while Moosend serves 100K+ users. Evaluate total cost of ownership based on team size and required integrations.
What are the main differences between Act-On and Moosend?
Act-On specializes in Lead nurturing, Email marketing, Landing pages, earning a 61/100 hiltonsoftware Score. Moosend focuses on Email campaigns, Automation workflows, Landing pages, scoring 75/100. Act-On is best for Mid-market B2B companies wanting dedicated marketing automation beyond email. Moosend is best for Budget-focused marketers wanting solid automation at low cost. Both Act-On and Moosend serve the Marketing Automation market but target different user profiles.
Can I migrate from Act-On to Moosend?
Migrating from Act-On to Moosend is possible since both operate in the Marketing Automation space. Export data from Act-On and verify Moosend import capabilities. Key features to evaluate: Lead nurturing, Email marketing, Landing pages (Act-On) versus Email campaigns, Automation workflows, Landing pages (Moosend). Running both Act-On and Moosend in parallel during a trial period ensures a smooth transition.
Is Act-On or Moosend better for small business?
For small businesses, Moosend offers a free plan making Moosend more budget-friendly at 75/100 on hiltonsoftware.co. Act-On (starting at $900/mo) is worth considering for Lead nurturing, Email marketing, Landing pages. Both Act-On and Moosend scale from SMB to enterprise.

Reviewed by Marcus Johnson, Marketing & Growth Specialist. Last updated: 2026-04-24. Pricing verified: March 2026.

Read our scoring methodology to understand how the hiltonsoftware Score is calculated.

Explore More Comparisons & Tools