Remote.com vs Workable: Complete Comparison (2026)

By Elena Kowalski, Security & Enterprise Editorยท12 years of experienceยทUpdated 2026-04-24ยท8 min read

In comparing Remote.com and Workable in 2026, Workable is the stronger choice for growing companies wanting an easy ats with built-in candidate sourcing due to easy to use for any size team. Remote.com excels for companies hiring employees in countries where they have no legal entity with strong ip protection clauses. Remote.com offers Employer of Record, Global payroll, Contractor management starting at $29/contractor/mo. Workable provides Job posting, AI sourcing, Interview tools from $189/mo. For teams prioritizing value, Workable delivers a hiltonsoftware Score of 68/100. Remote.com and Workable compete in the hr & recruitment segment of the SaaS market, where cloud-native solutions, API integrations, and workflow automation drive enterprise and SMB adoption. Other leading hr & recruitment tools include Workday, BambooHR, Greenhouse. Remote.com serves 4K+ orgs users globally (founded 2019) while Workable reports 27K+ orgs active users (founded 2012).

Remote.com vs Workable at a Glance

Remote.com
Workable
Starting Price
$29/contractor/mo
$189/mo
Free Plan
No
No
User Rating
4.5/5
4.6/5
Best For
Companies hiring employees in countries where they...
Growing companies wanting an easy ATS with built-i...
Users
4K+ orgs
27K+ orgs
Founded
2019
2012
hiltonsoftware Score
63/100
68/100
Pricing verified: March 2026 ยท Based on official vendor data
๐ŸŒŽ
Remote.com
HR & Recruitment
63
hiltonsoftware.co Score
VS
โœ…
Workable
HR & Recruitment
68
hiltonsoftware.co Score
RECOMMENDED

What are the main differences between Remote.com and Workable?

Remote.com and Workable differ across ease of use, features, value, support, integrations, scalability, and learning curve. Workable leads in 7 of 7 categories.

Remote.comWorkable
78Ease of Use81
75Features81
65Value for Money66
67Customer Support68
57Integrations62
56Scalability63
65Learning Curve70

What are the pros and cons of Remote.com vs Workable?

Remote.com
+Strong IP protection clauses
+Good for international hiring
-EOR fees can be high
-Support response varies by region
Workable
+Easy to use for any size team
+Strong AI candidate sourcing
-High base price for small hiring volume
-Limited HR features beyond hiring

Which is better, Remote.com or Workable?

After evaluating Remote.com and Workable across features, pricing, integrations, and user satisfaction, Workable earns a higher hiltonsoftware Score of 68/100 versus Remote.com at 63/100. Workable stands out for "easy to use for any size team" and "strong ai candidate sourcing". Remote.com delivers competitive advantages in "strong ip protection clauses", making Remote.com a viable alternative.

Neither Remote.com nor Workable offers a free plan. Remote.com starts at $29/contractor/mo and Workable at $189/mo.

Bottom line: Choose Remote.com for companies hiring employees in countries where they have no legal entity. Choose Workable for growing companies wanting an easy ats with built-in candidate sourcing. Both Remote.com and Workable are established hr & recruitment platforms.

CHOOSE REMOTE.COM IF:

Companies hiring employees in countries where they have no legal entity.

CHOOSE WORKABLE IF:

Growing companies wanting an easy ATS with built-in candidate sourcing.

Remote.com vs Workable: Frequently Asked Questions

Is Remote.com better than Workable in 2026?
Workable outperforms Remote.com in the 2026 hiltonsoftware.co analysis with a score of 68/100 compared to 63/100. Remote.com excels in Employer of Record, Global payroll, Contractor management, making Remote.com the better choice for Companies hiring employees in countries where they have no legal entity. Workable is the stronger option for Growing companies wanting an easy ATS with built-in candidate sourcing due to easy to use for any size team. For teams needing job posting, hiltonsoftware.co recommends Workable.
How does Remote.com pricing compare to Workable in 2026?
Remote.com starts at $29/contractor/mo with no free tier. Workable starts at $189/mo without a free plan. Remote.com includes features like Employer of Record, Global payroll, Contractor management. Workable provides Job posting, AI sourcing, Interview tools. Remote.com serves 4K+ orgs users while Workable serves 27K+ orgs users. Evaluate total cost of ownership based on team size and required integrations.
What are the main differences between Remote.com and Workable?
Remote.com specializes in Employer of Record, Global payroll, Contractor management, earning a 63/100 hiltonsoftware Score. Workable focuses on Job posting, AI sourcing, Interview tools, scoring 68/100. Remote.com is best for Companies hiring employees in countries where they have no legal entity. Workable is best for Growing companies wanting an easy ATS with built-in candidate sourcing. Both Remote.com and Workable serve the HR & Recruitment market but target different user profiles.
Can I migrate from Remote.com to Workable?
Migrating from Remote.com to Workable is possible since both operate in the HR & Recruitment space. Export data from Remote.com and verify Workable import capabilities. Key features to evaluate: Employer of Record, Global payroll, Contractor management (Remote.com) versus Job posting, AI sourcing, Interview tools (Workable). Running both Remote.com and Workable in parallel during a trial period ensures a smooth transition.
Is Remote.com or Workable better for small business?
Both Remote.com and Workable require paid plans (Remote.com: $29/contractor/mo, Workable: $189/mo). Remote.com (63/100) is ideal for Companies hiring employees in countries where they have no legal entity. Workable (68/100) fits Growing companies wanting an easy ATS with built-in candidate sourcing. Evaluate both during trial periods.

Reviewed by Elena Kowalski, Security & Enterprise Editor. Last updated: 2026-04-24. Pricing verified: March 2026.

Read our scoring methodology to understand how the hiltonsoftware Score is calculated.

Explore More Comparisons & Tools