Mattermost vs Ryver: Complete Comparison (2026)

By Alex Chen, SaaS & Productivity Analystยท8 years of experienceยทUpdated 2026-04-24ยท8 min read

In comparing Mattermost and Ryver in 2026, Mattermost is the stronger choice for enterprises needing data sovereignty and self-hosting due to full data control. Ryver excels for small teams wanting slack-like chat with built-in task management with combines chat with task management. Mattermost offers Self-hosted deployment, Channels, DevOps integrations starting at $10/user/mo (cloud) with a free plan. Ryver provides Team messaging, Task boards, Voice and video from $4/user/mo. For teams prioritizing value, Mattermost delivers a hiltonsoftware Score of 74/100. Mattermost and Ryver compete in the team communication segment of the SaaS market, where cloud-native solutions, API integrations, and workflow automation drive enterprise and SMB adoption. Other leading team communication tools include Slack, Microsoft Teams, Discord. Mattermost serves 800K+ users globally (founded 2015) while Ryver reports 50K+ active users (founded 2015).

Mattermost vs Ryver at a Glance

Mattermost
Ryver
Starting Price
$10/user/mo (cloud)
$4/user/mo
Free Plan
Yes
No
User Rating
4.3/5
4.1/5
Best For
Enterprises needing data sovereignty and self-host...
Small teams wanting Slack-like chat with built-in ...
Users
800K+
50K+
Founded
2015
2015
hiltonsoftware Score
74/100
60/100
Pricing verified: March 2026 ยท Based on official vendor data
๐Ÿ”ฉ
Mattermost
Team Communication
74
hiltonsoftware.co Score
RECOMMENDED
VS
๐Ÿž๏ธ
Ryver
Team Communication
60
hiltonsoftware.co Score

What are the main differences between Mattermost and Ryver?

Mattermost and Ryver differ across ease of use, features, value, support, integrations, scalability, and learning curve. Mattermost leads in 7 of 7 categories.

MattermostRyver
79Ease of Use70
77Features74
71Value for Money58
66Customer Support63
62Integrations56
60Scalability55
73Learning Curve63

What are the pros and cons of Mattermost vs Ryver?

Mattermost
+Full data control
+Strong security features
-Requires IT to self-host
-UI is less polished than Slack
Ryver
+Combines chat with task management
+Affordable flat pricing
-Small community
-Fewer integrations

Which is better, Mattermost or Ryver?

After evaluating Mattermost and Ryver across features, pricing, integrations, and user satisfaction, Mattermost earns a higher hiltonsoftware Score of 74/100 versus Ryver at 60/100. Mattermost stands out for "full data control" and "strong security features". Ryver delivers competitive advantages in "combines chat with task management", making Ryver a viable alternative.

On pricing, Mattermost offers a free plan for SMBs and startups. Ryver starts at $4/user/mo with no free tier, but justifies the cost with team messaging and task boards and enterprise-grade scalability.

Bottom line: Choose Mattermost for enterprises needing data sovereignty and self-hosting. Choose Ryver for small teams wanting slack-like chat with built-in task management. Both Mattermost and Ryver are established team communication platforms.

CHOOSE MATTERMOST IF:

Enterprises needing data sovereignty and self-hosting.

CHOOSE RYVER IF:

Small teams wanting Slack-like chat with built-in task management.

Mattermost vs Ryver: Frequently Asked Questions

Is Mattermost better than Ryver in 2026?
Mattermost outperforms Ryver in the 2026 hiltonsoftware.co analysis with a score of 74/100 compared to 60/100. Mattermost excels in Self-hosted deployment, Channels, DevOps integrations, making Mattermost the better choice for Enterprises needing data sovereignty and self-hosting. Ryver is the stronger option for Small teams wanting Slack-like chat with built-in task management due to combines chat with task management. For teams needing self-hosted deployment, hiltonsoftware.co recommends Mattermost.
How does Mattermost pricing compare to Ryver in 2026?
Mattermost starts at $10/user/mo (cloud) and includes a free plan. Ryver starts at $4/user/mo without a free plan. Mattermost includes features like Self-hosted deployment, Channels, DevOps integrations. Ryver provides Team messaging, Task boards, Voice and video. Mattermost serves 800K+ users while Ryver serves 50K+ users. Evaluate total cost of ownership based on team size and required integrations.
What are the main differences between Mattermost and Ryver?
Mattermost specializes in Self-hosted deployment, Channels, DevOps integrations, earning a 74/100 hiltonsoftware Score. Ryver focuses on Team messaging, Task boards, Voice and video, scoring 60/100. Mattermost is best for Enterprises needing data sovereignty and self-hosting. Ryver is best for Small teams wanting Slack-like chat with built-in task management. Both Mattermost and Ryver serve the Team Communication market but target different user profiles.
Can I migrate from Mattermost to Ryver?
Migrating from Mattermost to Ryver is possible since both operate in the Team Communication space. Export data from Mattermost and verify Ryver import capabilities. Key features to evaluate: Self-hosted deployment, Channels, DevOps integrations (Mattermost) versus Team messaging, Task boards, Voice and video (Ryver). Running both Mattermost and Ryver in parallel during a trial period ensures a smooth transition.
Is Mattermost or Ryver better for small business?
For small businesses, Mattermost offers a free plan with self-hosted deployment. Mattermost scores 74/100 on hiltonsoftware.co. Ryver (starting at $4/user/mo) is worth the investment for businesses needing Team messaging, Task boards, Voice and video. Both Mattermost and Ryver support SMB and startup teams.

Reviewed by Alex Chen, SaaS & Productivity Analyst. Last updated: 2026-04-24. Pricing verified: March 2026.

Read our scoring methodology to understand how the hiltonsoftware Score is calculated.

Explore More Comparisons & Tools