Act-On vs SharpSpring: Complete Comparison (2026)

By Marcus Johnson, Marketing & Growth Specialistยท7 years of experienceยทUpdated 2026-04-24ยท8 min read

In comparing Act-On and SharpSpring in 2026, SharpSpring is the stronger choice for agencies wanting white-label marketing automation at a lower cost than hubspot due to more affordable than hubspot enterprise. Act-On excels for mid-market b2b companies wanting dedicated marketing automation beyond email with good for mid-market b2b. Act-On offers Lead nurturing, Email marketing, Landing pages starting at $900/mo. SharpSpring provides Email automation, CRM, Landing pages from $449/mo. For teams prioritizing value, SharpSpring delivers a hiltonsoftware Score of 63/100. Act-On and SharpSpring compete in the marketing automation segment of the SaaS market, where cloud-native solutions, API integrations, and workflow automation drive enterprise and SMB adoption. Other leading marketing automation tools include HubSpot Marketing, Marketo, Pardot. Act-On serves 4K+ orgs users globally (founded 2008) while SharpSpring reports 10K+ orgs active users (founded 2012).

Act-On vs SharpSpring at a Glance

Act-On
SharpSpring
Starting Price
$900/mo
$449/mo
Free Plan
No
No
User Rating
4.2/5
4.3/5
Best For
Mid-market B2B companies wanting dedicated marketi...
Agencies wanting white-label marketing automation ...
Users
4K+ orgs
10K+ orgs
Founded
2008
2012
hiltonsoftware Score
61/100
63/100
Pricing verified: March 2026 ยท Based on official vendor data
๐ŸŽฏ
Act-On
Marketing Automation
61
hiltonsoftware.co Score
VS
๐ŸŒ€
SharpSpring
Marketing Automation
63
hiltonsoftware.co Score
RECOMMENDED

What are the main differences between Act-On and SharpSpring?

Act-On and SharpSpring differ across ease of use, features, value, support, integrations, scalability, and learning curve. SharpSpring leads in 6 of 7 categories.

Act-OnSharpSpring
72Ease of Use77
77Features76
60Value for Money60
65Customer Support65
54Integrations56
54Scalability60
64Learning Curve65

What are the pros and cons of Act-On vs SharpSpring?

Act-On
+Good for mid-market B2B
+Solid lead scoring
-Expensive for small teams
-Interface needs modernization
SharpSpring
+More affordable than HubSpot enterprise
+Good for agencies with re-brandable platform
-Interface less polished than HubSpot
-Fewer native integrations

Which is better, Act-On or SharpSpring?

After evaluating Act-On and SharpSpring across features, pricing, integrations, and user satisfaction, SharpSpring earns a higher hiltonsoftware Score of 63/100 versus Act-On at 61/100. SharpSpring stands out for "more affordable than hubspot enterprise" and "good for agencies with re-brandable platform". Act-On delivers competitive advantages in "good for mid-market b2b", making Act-On a viable alternative.

Neither Act-On nor SharpSpring offers a free plan. Act-On starts at $900/mo and SharpSpring at $449/mo.

Bottom line: Choose Act-On for mid-market b2b companies wanting dedicated marketing automation beyond email. Choose SharpSpring for agencies wanting white-label marketing automation at a lower cost than hubspot. Both Act-On and SharpSpring are established marketing automation platforms.

CHOOSE ACT-ON IF:

Mid-market B2B companies wanting dedicated marketing automation beyond email.

CHOOSE SHARPSPRING IF:

Agencies wanting white-label marketing automation at a lower cost than HubSpot.

Act-On vs SharpSpring: Frequently Asked Questions

Is Act-On better than SharpSpring in 2026?
SharpSpring outperforms Act-On in the 2026 hiltonsoftware.co analysis with a score of 63/100 compared to 61/100. Act-On excels in Lead nurturing, Email marketing, Landing pages, making Act-On the better choice for Mid-market B2B companies wanting dedicated marketing automation beyond email. SharpSpring is the stronger option for Agencies wanting white-label marketing automation at a lower cost than HubSpot due to more affordable than hubspot enterprise. For teams needing email automation, hiltonsoftware.co recommends SharpSpring.
How does Act-On pricing compare to SharpSpring in 2026?
Act-On starts at $900/mo with no free tier. SharpSpring starts at $449/mo without a free plan. Act-On includes features like Lead nurturing, Email marketing, Landing pages. SharpSpring provides Email automation, CRM, Landing pages. Act-On serves 4K+ orgs users while SharpSpring serves 10K+ orgs users. Evaluate total cost of ownership based on team size and required integrations.
What are the main differences between Act-On and SharpSpring?
Act-On specializes in Lead nurturing, Email marketing, Landing pages, earning a 61/100 hiltonsoftware Score. SharpSpring focuses on Email automation, CRM, Landing pages, scoring 63/100. Act-On is best for Mid-market B2B companies wanting dedicated marketing automation beyond email. SharpSpring is best for Agencies wanting white-label marketing automation at a lower cost than HubSpot. Both Act-On and SharpSpring serve the Marketing Automation market but target different user profiles.
Can I migrate from Act-On to SharpSpring?
Migrating from Act-On to SharpSpring is possible since both operate in the Marketing Automation space. Export data from Act-On and verify SharpSpring import capabilities. Key features to evaluate: Lead nurturing, Email marketing, Landing pages (Act-On) versus Email automation, CRM, Landing pages (SharpSpring). Running both Act-On and SharpSpring in parallel during a trial period ensures a smooth transition.
Is Act-On or SharpSpring better for small business?
Both Act-On and SharpSpring require paid plans (Act-On: $900/mo, SharpSpring: $449/mo). Act-On (61/100) is ideal for Mid-market B2B companies wanting dedicated marketing automation beyond email. SharpSpring (63/100) fits Agencies wanting white-label marketing automation at a lower cost than HubSpot. Evaluate both during trial periods.

Reviewed by Marcus Johnson, Marketing & Growth Specialist. Last updated: 2026-04-24. Pricing verified: March 2026.

Read our scoring methodology to understand how the hiltonsoftware Score is calculated.

Explore More Comparisons & Tools