Backblaze B2 vs Filebase: Complete Comparison (2026)

By Sarah Mitchell, Cloud & Developer Tools Editorยท10 years of experienceยทUpdated 2026-04-24ยท8 min read

In comparing Backblaze B2 and Filebase in 2026, Backblaze B2 is the stronger choice for developers and businesses needing affordable, s3-compatible object storage due to very cheap storage cost. Filebase excels for web3 developers wanting decentralized, s3-compatible object storage with decentralized redundancy. Backblaze B2 offers S3-compatible API, 10GB free, CDN integration starting at $0.006/GB/mo with a free plan. Filebase provides IPFS pinning, S3-compatible API, Sia and Storj networks from $5.99/mo with a free tier. For teams prioritizing value, Backblaze B2 delivers a hiltonsoftware Score of 78/100. Backblaze B2 and Filebase compete in the cloud storage segment of the SaaS market, where cloud-native solutions, API integrations, and workflow automation drive enterprise and SMB adoption. Other leading cloud storage tools include Google Drive, Dropbox, OneDrive. Backblaze B2 serves 500K+ users globally (founded 2007) while Filebase reports 10K+ active users (founded 2018).

Backblaze B2 vs Filebase at a Glance

Backblaze B2
Filebase
Starting Price
$0.006/GB/mo
$5.99/mo
Free Plan
Yes
Yes
User Rating
4.6/5
4.2/5
Best For
Developers and businesses needing affordable, S3-c...
Web3 developers wanting decentralized, S3-compatib...
Users
500K+
10K+
Founded
2007
2018
hiltonsoftware Score
78/100
64/100
Pricing verified: March 2026 ยท Based on official vendor data
๐Ÿ”ฅ
Backblaze B2
Cloud Storage
78
hiltonsoftware.co Score
RECOMMENDED
VS
๐Ÿ—„๏ธ
Filebase
Cloud Storage
64
hiltonsoftware.co Score

What are the main differences between Backblaze B2 and Filebase?

Backblaze B2 and Filebase differ across ease of use, features, value, support, integrations, scalability, and learning curve. Backblaze B2 leads in 7 of 7 categories.

Backblaze B2Filebase
85Ease of Use79
80Features71
74Value for Money71
74Customer Support63
71Integrations56
66Scalability54
75Learning Curve67

What are the pros and cons of Backblaze B2 vs Filebase?

Backblaze B2
+Very cheap storage cost
+S3 API compatible
-No desktop sync client
-Developer-focused, not end-user
Filebase
+Decentralized redundancy
+Affordable pricing
-Niche use case
-Less documentation

Which is better, Backblaze B2 or Filebase?

After evaluating Backblaze B2 and Filebase across features, pricing, integrations, and user satisfaction, Backblaze B2 earns a higher hiltonsoftware Score of 78/100 versus Filebase at 64/100. Backblaze B2 stands out for "very cheap storage cost" and "s3 api compatible". Filebase delivers competitive advantages in "decentralized redundancy", making Filebase a viable alternative.

Both Backblaze B2 and Filebase offer free plans. Backblaze B2 paid plans start at $0.006/GB/mo while Filebase begins at $5.99/mo. ROI depends on which features justify upgrading.

Bottom line: Choose Backblaze B2 for developers and businesses needing affordable, s3-compatible object storage. Choose Filebase for web3 developers wanting decentralized, s3-compatible object storage. Both Backblaze B2 and Filebase are established cloud storage platforms.

CHOOSE BACKBLAZE B2 IF:

Developers and businesses needing affordable, S3-compatible object storage.

CHOOSE FILEBASE IF:

Web3 developers wanting decentralized, S3-compatible object storage.

Backblaze B2 vs Filebase: Frequently Asked Questions

Is Backblaze B2 better than Filebase in 2026?
Backblaze B2 outperforms Filebase in the 2026 hiltonsoftware.co analysis with a score of 78/100 compared to 64/100. Backblaze B2 excels in S3-compatible API, 10GB free, CDN integration, making Backblaze B2 the better choice for Developers and businesses needing affordable, S3-compatible object storage. Filebase is the stronger option for Web3 developers wanting decentralized, S3-compatible object storage due to decentralized redundancy. For teams needing s3-compatible api, hiltonsoftware.co recommends Backblaze B2.
How does Backblaze B2 pricing compare to Filebase in 2026?
Backblaze B2 starts at $0.006/GB/mo and includes a free plan. Filebase starts at $5.99/mo and offers a free plan. Backblaze B2 includes features like S3-compatible API, 10GB free, CDN integration. Filebase provides IPFS pinning, S3-compatible API, Sia and Storj networks. Backblaze B2 serves 500K+ users while Filebase serves 10K+ users. Evaluate total cost of ownership based on team size and required integrations.
What are the main differences between Backblaze B2 and Filebase?
Backblaze B2 specializes in S3-compatible API, 10GB free, CDN integration, earning a 78/100 hiltonsoftware Score. Filebase focuses on IPFS pinning, S3-compatible API, Sia and Storj networks, scoring 64/100. Backblaze B2 is best for Developers and businesses needing affordable, S3-compatible object storage. Filebase is best for Web3 developers wanting decentralized, S3-compatible object storage. Both Backblaze B2 and Filebase serve the Cloud Storage market but target different user profiles.
Can I migrate from Backblaze B2 to Filebase?
Migrating from Backblaze B2 to Filebase is possible since both operate in the Cloud Storage space. Export data from Backblaze B2 and verify Filebase import capabilities. Key features to evaluate: S3-compatible API, 10GB free, CDN integration (Backblaze B2) versus IPFS pinning, S3-compatible API, Sia and Storj networks (Filebase). Running both Backblaze B2 and Filebase in parallel during a trial period ensures a smooth transition.
Is Backblaze B2 or Filebase better for small business?
Both Backblaze B2 and Filebase offer free plans. Backblaze B2 (78/100) is ideal for Developers and businesses needing affordable, S3-compatible object storage. Filebase (64/100) fits Web3 developers wanting decentralized, S3-compatible object storage. Evaluate both during trial periods.

Reviewed by Sarah Mitchell, Cloud & Developer Tools Editor. Last updated: 2026-04-24. Pricing verified: March 2026.

Read our scoring methodology to understand how the hiltonsoftware Score is calculated.

Explore More Comparisons & Tools