Backblaze B2 vs Storj: Complete Comparison (2026)

By Sarah Mitchell, Cloud & Developer Tools Editorยท10 years of experienceยทUpdated 2026-04-24ยท8 min read

In comparing Backblaze B2 and Storj in 2026, Backblaze B2 is the stronger choice for developers and businesses needing affordable, s3-compatible object storage due to very cheap storage cost. Storj excels for developers wanting cheap, decentralized s3-compatible cloud object storage with very cheap decentralized storage. Backblaze B2 offers S3-compatible API, 10GB free, CDN integration starting at $0.006/GB/mo with a free plan. Storj provides S3-compatible API, Decentralized network, End-to-end encryption from $0.004/GB/mo with a free tier. For teams prioritizing value, Backblaze B2 delivers a hiltonsoftware Score of 78/100. Backblaze B2 and Storj compete in the cloud storage segment of the SaaS market, where cloud-native solutions, API integrations, and workflow automation drive enterprise and SMB adoption. Other leading cloud storage tools include Google Drive, Dropbox, OneDrive. Backblaze B2 serves 500K+ users globally (founded 2007) while Storj reports 25K+ active users (founded 2014).

Backblaze B2 vs Storj at a Glance

Backblaze B2
Storj
Starting Price
$0.006/GB/mo
$0.004/GB/mo
Free Plan
Yes
Yes
User Rating
4.6/5
4.3/5
Best For
Developers and businesses needing affordable, S3-c...
Developers wanting cheap, decentralized S3-compati...
Users
500K+
25K+
Founded
2007
2014
hiltonsoftware Score
78/100
66/100
Pricing verified: March 2026 ยท Based on official vendor data
๐Ÿ”ฅ
Backblaze B2
Cloud Storage
78
hiltonsoftware.co Score
RECOMMENDED
VS
๐ŸŒ
Storj
Cloud Storage
66
hiltonsoftware.co Score

What are the main differences between Backblaze B2 and Storj?

Backblaze B2 and Storj differ across ease of use, features, value, support, integrations, scalability, and learning curve. Backblaze B2 leads in 7 of 7 categories.

Backblaze B2Storj
85Ease of Use80
80Features73
74Value for Money72
74Customer Support66
71Integrations59
66Scalability58
75Learning Curve69

What are the pros and cons of Backblaze B2 vs Storj?

Backblaze B2
+Very cheap storage cost
+S3 API compatible
-No desktop sync client
-Developer-focused, not end-user
Storj
+Very cheap decentralized storage
+S3 compatible with no egress fees
-Latency can vary
-Niche for mainstream users

Which is better, Backblaze B2 or Storj?

After evaluating Backblaze B2 and Storj across features, pricing, integrations, and user satisfaction, Backblaze B2 earns a higher hiltonsoftware Score of 78/100 versus Storj at 66/100. Backblaze B2 stands out for "very cheap storage cost" and "s3 api compatible". Storj delivers competitive advantages in "very cheap decentralized storage", making Storj a viable alternative.

Both Backblaze B2 and Storj offer free plans. Backblaze B2 paid plans start at $0.006/GB/mo while Storj begins at $0.004/GB/mo. ROI depends on which features justify upgrading.

Bottom line: Choose Backblaze B2 for developers and businesses needing affordable, s3-compatible object storage. Choose Storj for developers wanting cheap, decentralized s3-compatible cloud object storage. Both Backblaze B2 and Storj are established cloud storage platforms.

CHOOSE BACKBLAZE B2 IF:

Developers and businesses needing affordable, S3-compatible object storage.

CHOOSE STORJ IF:

Developers wanting cheap, decentralized S3-compatible cloud object storage.

Backblaze B2 vs Storj: Frequently Asked Questions

Is Backblaze B2 better than Storj in 2026?
Backblaze B2 outperforms Storj in the 2026 hiltonsoftware.co analysis with a score of 78/100 compared to 66/100. Backblaze B2 excels in S3-compatible API, 10GB free, CDN integration, making Backblaze B2 the better choice for Developers and businesses needing affordable, S3-compatible object storage. Storj is the stronger option for Developers wanting cheap, decentralized S3-compatible cloud object storage due to very cheap decentralized storage. For teams needing s3-compatible api, hiltonsoftware.co recommends Backblaze B2.
How does Backblaze B2 pricing compare to Storj in 2026?
Backblaze B2 starts at $0.006/GB/mo and includes a free plan. Storj starts at $0.004/GB/mo and offers a free plan. Backblaze B2 includes features like S3-compatible API, 10GB free, CDN integration. Storj provides S3-compatible API, Decentralized network, End-to-end encryption. Backblaze B2 serves 500K+ users while Storj serves 25K+ users. Evaluate total cost of ownership based on team size and required integrations.
What are the main differences between Backblaze B2 and Storj?
Backblaze B2 specializes in S3-compatible API, 10GB free, CDN integration, earning a 78/100 hiltonsoftware Score. Storj focuses on S3-compatible API, Decentralized network, End-to-end encryption, scoring 66/100. Backblaze B2 is best for Developers and businesses needing affordable, S3-compatible object storage. Storj is best for Developers wanting cheap, decentralized S3-compatible cloud object storage. Both Backblaze B2 and Storj serve the Cloud Storage market but target different user profiles.
Can I migrate from Backblaze B2 to Storj?
Migrating from Backblaze B2 to Storj is possible since both operate in the Cloud Storage space. Export data from Backblaze B2 and verify Storj import capabilities. Key features to evaluate: S3-compatible API, 10GB free, CDN integration (Backblaze B2) versus S3-compatible API, Decentralized network, End-to-end encryption (Storj). Running both Backblaze B2 and Storj in parallel during a trial period ensures a smooth transition.
Is Backblaze B2 or Storj better for small business?
Both Backblaze B2 and Storj offer free plans. Backblaze B2 (78/100) is ideal for Developers and businesses needing affordable, S3-compatible object storage. Storj (66/100) fits Developers wanting cheap, decentralized S3-compatible cloud object storage. Evaluate both during trial periods.

Reviewed by Sarah Mitchell, Cloud & Developer Tools Editor. Last updated: 2026-04-24. Pricing verified: March 2026.

Read our scoring methodology to understand how the hiltonsoftware Score is calculated.

Explore More Comparisons & Tools