Act-On vs Encharge: Complete Comparison (2026)

By Marcus Johnson, Marketing & Growth Specialistยท7 years of experienceยทUpdated 2026-04-24ยท8 min read

In comparing Act-On and Encharge in 2026, Act-On is the stronger choice for mid-market b2b companies wanting dedicated marketing automation beyond email due to good for mid-market b2b. Encharge excels for saas companies wanting behavior-based onboarding and lifecycle automation with purpose-built for saas companies. Act-On offers Lead nurturing, Email marketing, Landing pages starting at $900/mo. Encharge provides Behavior-based automation, User segmentation, Lead scoring from $49/mo. For teams prioritizing value, Act-On delivers a hiltonsoftware Score of 61/100. Act-On and Encharge compete in the marketing automation segment of the SaaS market, where cloud-native solutions, API integrations, and workflow automation drive enterprise and SMB adoption. Other leading marketing automation tools include HubSpot Marketing, Marketo, Pardot. Act-On serves 4K+ orgs users globally (founded 2008) while Encharge reports 3K+ orgs active users (founded 2018).

Act-On vs Encharge at a Glance

Act-On
Encharge
Starting Price
$900/mo
$49/mo
Free Plan
No
No
User Rating
4.2/5
4.6/5
Best For
Mid-market B2B companies wanting dedicated marketi...
SaaS companies wanting behavior-based onboarding a...
Users
4K+ orgs
3K+ orgs
Founded
2008
2018
hiltonsoftware Score
61/100
60/100
Pricing verified: March 2026 ยท Based on official vendor data
๐ŸŽฏ
Act-On
Marketing Automation
61
hiltonsoftware.co Score
RECOMMENDED
VS
โšก
Encharge
Marketing Automation
60
hiltonsoftware.co Score

What are the main differences between Act-On and Encharge?

Act-On and Encharge differ across ease of use, features, value, support, integrations, scalability, and learning curve. Act-On leads in 0 of 7 categories.

Act-OnEncharge
72Ease of Use79
77Features78
60Value for Money64
65Customer Support68
54Integrations60
54Scalability56
64Learning Curve68

What are the pros and cons of Act-On vs Encharge?

Act-On
+Good for mid-market B2B
+Solid lead scoring
-Expensive for small teams
-Interface needs modernization
Encharge
+Purpose-built for SaaS companies
+Visual flow builder is intuitive
-Expensive for small startups
-Limited outside SaaS use case

Which is better, Act-On or Encharge?

After evaluating Act-On and Encharge across features, pricing, integrations, and user satisfaction, Act-On earns a higher hiltonsoftware Score of 61/100 versus Encharge at 60/100. Act-On stands out for "good for mid-market b2b" and "solid lead scoring". Encharge delivers competitive advantages in "purpose-built for saas companies", making Encharge a viable alternative.

Neither Act-On nor Encharge offers a free plan. Act-On starts at $900/mo and Encharge at $49/mo.

Bottom line: Choose Act-On for mid-market b2b companies wanting dedicated marketing automation beyond email. Choose Encharge for saas companies wanting behavior-based onboarding and lifecycle automation. Both Act-On and Encharge are established marketing automation platforms.

CHOOSE ACT-ON IF:

Mid-market B2B companies wanting dedicated marketing automation beyond email.

CHOOSE ENCHARGE IF:

SaaS companies wanting behavior-based onboarding and lifecycle automation.

Act-On vs Encharge: Frequently Asked Questions

Is Act-On better than Encharge in 2026?
Act-On outperforms Encharge in the 2026 hiltonsoftware.co analysis with a score of 61/100 compared to 60/100. Act-On excels in Lead nurturing, Email marketing, Landing pages, making Act-On the better choice for Mid-market B2B companies wanting dedicated marketing automation beyond email. Encharge is the stronger option for SaaS companies wanting behavior-based onboarding and lifecycle automation due to purpose-built for saas companies. For teams needing lead nurturing, hiltonsoftware.co recommends Act-On.
How does Act-On pricing compare to Encharge in 2026?
Act-On starts at $900/mo with no free tier. Encharge starts at $49/mo without a free plan. Act-On includes features like Lead nurturing, Email marketing, Landing pages. Encharge provides Behavior-based automation, User segmentation, Lead scoring. Act-On serves 4K+ orgs users while Encharge serves 3K+ orgs users. Evaluate total cost of ownership based on team size and required integrations.
What are the main differences between Act-On and Encharge?
Act-On specializes in Lead nurturing, Email marketing, Landing pages, earning a 61/100 hiltonsoftware Score. Encharge focuses on Behavior-based automation, User segmentation, Lead scoring, scoring 60/100. Act-On is best for Mid-market B2B companies wanting dedicated marketing automation beyond email. Encharge is best for SaaS companies wanting behavior-based onboarding and lifecycle automation. Both Act-On and Encharge serve the Marketing Automation market but target different user profiles.
Can I migrate from Act-On to Encharge?
Migrating from Act-On to Encharge is possible since both operate in the Marketing Automation space. Export data from Act-On and verify Encharge import capabilities. Key features to evaluate: Lead nurturing, Email marketing, Landing pages (Act-On) versus Behavior-based automation, User segmentation, Lead scoring (Encharge). Running both Act-On and Encharge in parallel during a trial period ensures a smooth transition.
Is Act-On or Encharge better for small business?
Both Act-On and Encharge require paid plans (Act-On: $900/mo, Encharge: $49/mo). Act-On (61/100) is ideal for Mid-market B2B companies wanting dedicated marketing automation beyond email. Encharge (60/100) fits SaaS companies wanting behavior-based onboarding and lifecycle automation. Evaluate both during trial periods.

Reviewed by Marcus Johnson, Marketing & Growth Specialist. Last updated: 2026-04-24. Pricing verified: March 2026.

Read our scoring methodology to understand how the hiltonsoftware Score is calculated.

Explore More Comparisons & Tools